HBR in Brief

Harvard Business Online

The Weird Rules of Creativity

Tags: Hiring, Team, Idea, Sutton, Recruitment & Selection, Team Management, Human Resources, Workforce Management, Management, Robert I. Sutton, Harvard Business Review, In Brief

  • download
  • Print
  • Recommend
  • 35

The Idea in Brief

Hire people you don't like, then promote them when they defy you. Wholeheartedly commit to risky projects. Get your happiest workers arguing. And keep your innovators away from customers.

Recipes for disaster? No, fuel for innovation.

Traditional management practices apply when you need to make money now from tried-and-true products and services--but they don't foster creativity.

To innovate, companies must ignore longstanding management wisdom and adopt downright weird ways. Unnerving, yes, but consider the payoffs: broadened knowledge, fresh perspectives on old problems, and the freedom to break from the past.

The Idea in Practice

To encourage creativity, take these counterintuitive approaches to hiring, managing, and risk-taking:

Hiring

Recruit people who aren't blinded by preconceptions, including:

  • mavericks and misfits who drive bosses and coworkers crazy because they reject popular opinion and bull-headedly champion their own ideas.

When new hires at a toy company pointed out current products' flaws, their behavior made senior executives "hate them." But the complainers kept generating great new-toy ideas. The lesson? Intentionally hire unlikable, creative people.

  • people with seemingly irrelevant skills

Design Continuum hires engineers who have moonlighted as sculptors, carpenters, graffiti artists, and rock musicians. Their offbeat backgrounds provide a broad palette of product-design ideas to try in new ways.

  • novices who don't know how things are "supposed to be"; e.g., Dyson Appliances, maker of the hottest-selling vacuum cleaner in the U.K., employs new university graduates.
  • experts in some unrelated area

Ballard Power Systems hired chemistry professor Keith Prater to develop batteries, though he lacked related experience. Prater proceeded to generate breakthroughs in fuel-cell technology that may replace internal combustion.

Managing

Encourage people to defy superiors and peers.

When HP executives advised Chuck House to abandon a monitor he was developing, he went on vacation--and showed potential customers a prototype. Ultimately, House's monitor generated $35 million in revenue. Founder David Packard gave him a medal for "extraordinary contempt and defiance beyond the normal call of engineering duty."

Keep creative types away from customers, critics--and anyone focused only on money. Sequestered in basement offices, Data General's "MicroKids" designed a minicomputer better and faster than if they had worked under critics' and bosses' eyes.

Get happy people fighting about ideas; they'll surface weak spots in each other's thinking.

Reward successes and failures. You can't generate a few good ideas without also generating numerous bad ones. Demote, transfer, or fire people who talk and plan but don't act.

Risk-Taking

Risky projects' odds of succeeding increase with wholehearted commitment. Therefore, back projects that have the most dedicated, persuasive heretics on board. You can't eliminate risk entirely, but you can ensure new ideas aren't biased by knowledge of past successes.

At software firm Reactivity's brainstorming meetings, employees jot technologies on one stack of index cards and industries on another--then randomly pair them. Both useless and promising new-product and applications ideas emerge.

Copyright 2002 Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.

Further Reading

Articles

How to Kill Creativity

Harvard Business Review

September-October 1998

by Teresa M. Amabile

It's not easy being weird. After all, businesses do need order and control to function day to day. But order and control can inadvertently undermine employees' ability to reconfigure existing ideas in creative and valuable ways. To foster an innovative workplace, of course you need to tap into people's expertise and creative-thinking skills. But most important, you must fire up their intrinsic motivation--their passion for particular challenges. Match them with assignments that stretch them (but not too thin), give them freedom within company goals (that is, tell them which mountain to climb--but not how to climb it), give them plenty of time to play with ideas, and let them know that what they do matters.

Putting Your Company's Whole Brain to Work

Harvard Business Review

July-August 1997

by Dorothy Leonard and Susaan Straus

Innovative types may seem abrasive--but creative abrasion can work wonders for your firm's ability to innovate. To achieve this fecund form of friction, make employees' different cognitive styles rub together in ways that spark fresh, original thinking. The authors explain the various thinking styles--including logical, analytical ("left-brain") and nonlinear, intuitive ("right-brain"). They then show how to create "whole-brained" teams by assessing your own and your team members' styles, identifying gaps, hiring people who embody any missing styles, and actively managing the creative process (e.g., taking time to acknowledge team members' differences and devising clear, simple guidelines for handling conflicts).

Book

Weird Ideas That Work: 11 ½ Practices for Promoting, Managing, and Sustaining Innovation

Free Press

November 2001

by Robert I. Sutton

Want more weirdness? Take a gander at this quirky book--from which Sutton adapted his Harvard Business Review article. The book codifies all of Sutton's counterintuitive ideas for turning your company from staid and safe to wild and woolly. Sutton draws on extensive research in behavioral psychology to support his recommendations. As he explains, the practices companies need to sustain performance are in constant tension with those that give rise to new ideas. But striking a balance between the two kinds of practices is possible--and essential. Sutton provides many examples of how some of the most creative teams and companies, from a broad range of industries, are inventing novel--and highly profitable--products and services.

About the Authors

Robert I. Sutton is a professor of management science and engineering at Stanford University in Stanford, California. He is the author of Weird Ideas That Work: 11½ Practices for Promoting, Managing, and Sustaining Innovation (Free Press, November 2001), from which this article is adapted.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Caroline Schroder, Sulgrave Resources & Research LLC

    12/04/07 | Report as spam

    Unexpected Consequences: Ballard

    Ballard may not be the best example of success. It just sold its automotive fuel cell assets to Daimler and Ford, including all of the IP, test equipment and inventory with transfer of the employees and leaving development to Daimler and Ford at, unusually, Ballard facilities. Ballard will focus on fuel cell back up power and residential cogen.

  •  
    2

    barrymaher@...

    12/04/07 | Report as spam

    RE: The Weird Rules of Creativity

    Management fads can have disastrous consequences. While there's an element of truth in each one of these bromides, accepting them whole cloth without a giant dose of qualification could be a prescription for corporate failure. Sorry, but the real world just isn't this simplistic or amenable to such easy, pat answers.

    Barry Maher
    www.barrymaher.com

  •  
    3

    wirc@...

    12/05/07 | Report as spam

    RE: The Weird Rules of Creativity

    In my most humble opinion, if more business were freed up to allow in such creative thinking, the whole world would be a much happier place. Uniform thinking creates uniform work, free thinkers are where most business comes from until the uniform people arrive, then it is back to being boring dull & just not interesting.
    Rosemary McKenzie-Ferguson

  •  
    4

    colleen.cunningham@...

    12/05/07 | Report as spam

    RE: The Weird Rules of Creativity

    I work in education and there is such a high price placed on conformity--even more so now that there is No Child Left Behind. Everyone generally thinks alike at the top and loose boards get nailed down. Maverick teachers, administrators and PARENTS are not prized for what they bring. Innovation has essentially stopped in this arena. How do I get this to every administrator and regulator in the country?

  •  
    5

    jimnewbold

    12/07/07 | Report as spam

    RE: The Weird Rules of Creativity

    I am a creative person. This article really misses the boat from a creative person's perspective. Of all the books and articles I have read, I find that Eric Maisel demonstrates the best understanding of the creative person's mind and way of life. For me, his "Coaching the Artist Within" is extremely helpful. Dr. Maisel is creative, educated, and productive. He fully understands why creative people are unproductive and provides the best ways to bring their work to light.

    To think of the creative person as weird, unlikable, and argumentative is an overgeneralization and lacks sensibility. As a segment of the general population, there are many personalities present within the creative ranks.

    If some seem disagreeable (possibly "untamable") it would be wise to consider why they are the way they are. Being creative in a structured world is very difficult. Creative personalities who are extrovert and forceful are difficult to be around. But, there are as many personality types within the creative subset of the population as there are within the general population.

    Before anyone decides to hire or manage creative people, it would be wise to read Dr. Maisel's books, http://www.ericmaisel.com/em_books_lg.html, or perhaps attend one of his workshops. Listen to the way he understands and communicates with creative persons. It would go a long way toward a fruitful relationship.

    Who knows? You may even bring out your own creativity!

  •  
    6

    myoriginals

    12/10/07 | Report as spam

    Who's wacko?

    I'm tired of people calling the creatives 'wacko'. I like the fact that this article notes that it's the creatives that can generate the great ideas. Creatives don't think tangentially, and thus they arrive at unique places with one-of-a-kind ideas. However, did one ever think that us creatives think the 'bottom line money-cenrics' are the wackos, lacking any original, unique thought beyond how to create a formula in a spreadsheet?? Touche.

  •  
    7

    ballina onq

    12/10/07 | Report as spam

    Tangental?

    Either you consider creative types to be the norm or you dont own a dictionary; The term tangental MEANS to think on a tangent, abaxially, not like the centre ie... creatively. Before you 'align' yourself under a banner, it is best to understand what is written above your head.

  •  
    8

    kajira2

    01/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: The Weird Rules of Creativity

    Recycling this article, from 2002, about a book from 2001, is rather pathetic -- and the content somewhat perplexing coming from the author of The No ******* Rule. Hire unlikable types who are disruptive? Encourage people to defy superiors and peers? Isn't there a more mature way of being creative? Sure there is, and you don't have to be a weirdo to get your point across.

    I find especially dubious the line about the HP engineer who went to potential customers being placed directly above the line exhorting managers to keep engineers away from customers. Cobbled together with care and a heaping bucket of hyperbole -- should have followed your own advice and hired a creative type for the task rather than delegate it to a bored intern.

  •  
    9

    yourpalgary@...

    01/11/08 | Report as spam

    Reality Check

    The author was smoking crack at the time of the writing of this article as part of being creatively "weird". I also think it would be weird to give out candy to everyone in the business that is laced with acid/LSD, then everyone can trip out and get creative, then they write about thier experiences as a kind of innovative product the company makes, then...phfffffffft!...hak....cough....then..oh man I forgot what I was talking about....something about being creamated?

  •  
    10

    yourpalgary@...

    01/11/08 | Report as spam

    RE: The Weird Rules of Creativity

    The Golden Rule in corporations :"He with the gold makes the rules."

    What lacks from this true and excellent article is any mention that these weird creative suggestions must be managed by skilled professionals, and the challenge is the folks with the Gold look at the numbers mainly, well only. There must be some understanding on the part of the "gold owners" that this might create short term chaos and may slow profits for a period, while innovation takes "hold". In many companies, fear for job retention creates scapegoats and such if "change-fear" is not well managed. I would assert that many owners are wary of these "new concepts" and would rather 'just hire' the "innovators" because the gold owners RARELY understand real creative power and energy - they often find it odd, immature, and mostly a money-waster. I do not give industry much credit for having an ear to the innovator's song.

  •  
    11

    Jacob Medad

    01/11/08 | Report as spam

    RE: The Weird Rules of Creativity

    Sir,

    I need The Weird Rules of Creativity *NEW*

    Thank you.

    Jacob Medad

  •  
    12

    Jacob Medad

    01/11/08 | Report as spam

    enquiry on how to be a student with you.

    Thank you very much, Sir.

    One more thing I wish to know is this: How can I become a student with your Institution with a lower expected requirement? Can one be accepted to the school on UNDERTAKING to present on or before finishing the school?

    I would highly appreciete your continued cooperation and kind consideration on this request, please.

    Thank you while anticipating.

  •  
    13

    romemele

    04/25/08 | Report as spam

    RE: The Weird Rules of Creativity

    Interesting article....

    But, I doubt the success of firms who uses these kind of strategies. The examples provided are inspiring, but these are very few.
    And the relevance of such examples is just like an advert statements : '9 out of 10 doctors prescribes 'xyz' for fever' .
    (possibility is, those 9 doctors could be an affiliate of xyz producing company, which they intentionally might have omitted').

  •  
    14

    herryalbet

    04/01/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The sell to the world

    There must be some understanding on the part of the "gold owners" that this might create short term chaos and may slow profits for a period, while innovation takes "hold".As he explains, the practices companies need to sustain performance are in constant tension with those that give rise to new ideas.

  •  
    15

    jackblack8080

    04/01/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The Weird Rules of Creativity

    that this might create short term chaos and may slow profits for a period, while innovation takes "hold",but not too thin), give them freedom within company goals (that is, tell them which mountain to climb--but not how to climb it), give them plenty of time to play with ideas, and let them know,companies must ignore longstanding management wisdom and adopt downright weird ways

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement