PNM Resources, Inc. Q4 2008 Earnings Call Transcript

  • download
  • Print
  • Recommend
  • 0

2009-02-06 12:00:45.0

Tags: New Mexico, Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc., Call Transcript, Earnings, Question, PNM Resources Inc., Seeking Alpha

Question-and-Answer Session

Thank you. (Operator Instructions). And we’ll take our first question from Jonathan Arnold, Merrill Lynch.

Jonathan Arnold – Merrill Lynch

Hi, good morning guys

Jeffry E. Sterba

Hi, Jon.

Gina Jacobi

Good morning

Jonathan Arnold – Merrill Lynch

I had a quick question on, you talked about this the new legislation that’s being introduced with the future test year and CWIP et cetera. Two questions on that, what is the timing, how long is it likely for that to take to navigate through the legislature. And then just some reminders around when the session is open would be helpful. Secondly, I am guessing you would want to file a new case to take – it reflecting that at some point. How should we think about your future rate plans beyond the current case in PNM?

Gina Jacobi

Thanks for the question Jonathan. The session is a 60-day session this year in New Mexico. It’s started in mid January, so it will end in mid March. We think this bill will probably take the whole amount of time, just because most of the bills are taking the full 60 days, and the first priority on the legislature plate here is obviously the budget deficit in New Mexico, which is not as bad as in many states, but we do have a deficit. So, I would look for that, probably the middle of March to come out. In terms of future plans and when we would have a new case that question is really dependent upon the outcome of the current case that we have now. So, once we have the conclusion of that case will take a look at what we won’t want to do. In the future test year, you’re obviously, we would want to get our costs under the future test year as soon as possible after that. But I think the biggest determinant is going to be what happens in this case.

Jeffry E. Sterba

One thing to add to that Jonathan is, for our Southern Mexico territory, its real clear that we will be filing a rate case, that isn’t dependent so much on the outcome of the current PNM rate case for rates to go into effect in early 2011. And if this ball passes Pat would you use that legislation for the shaping of that rate case for the southern territory.

Pat Vincent-Collawn

Thank you, Jeff.

 

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement