HBR in Brief

Harvard Business Online

Rethinking Trust

Tags: Cue, Trust, Relationship Builder, Financial Accounting, Finance, Harvard Business Review, In Brief, Roderick M. Kramer, Work Life, Business Skills

  • download
  • Print
  • Recommend
  • 5

The Idea in Brief

  • Trust is essential for business and economic success. But recent financial scandals suggest that people aren't always very smart about whom they trust. Bernard Madoff took in some of the world's cleverest people.

  • In evolution, trust served humans well because it increased the chances that vulnerable infants would survive. Our body chemistry rewards us for trusting, and we quickly decide to trust others on the basis of simple surface cues such as their physical similarity to us.

  • Our readiness to trust makes us likely to make mistakes. At a species level, that doesn't matter so long as more people are trustworthy than not. At the individual level, though, misplaced trust can get us into trouble. To survive as individuals, we'll have to learn to temper our trust.

The Idea in Practice

To trust wisely, we need to readjust our mind-set and behavioral habits, following seven basic rules.

Rule 1: Know yourself. If you tend to trust the wrong people, you must work on interpreting the cues you receive. If you're good at recognizing cues but have difficulty forging trusting relationships, then you'll have to expand your repertoire of trust-building behaviors.

Rule 2: Start small. Measured trust begins with small acts that foster reciprocity. A good example of the dynamic was displayed by Hewlett-Packard in the early 1980s. Management allowed engineers to take equipment home whenever they needed to, without having to go through a lot of red tape. That sent a strong signal that the company trusted employees, yet it involved relatively little risk, because the policy was tied to employees' not abusing the trust.

Rule 3: Write an escape clause. With a clearly articulated plan for disengagement, people can trust more fully and with more commitment. In Hollywood, scriptwriters register their pitches with the Writers Guild--a simple act that hedges against the risk that others will claim a story as their own.

Rule 4: Send strong signals. Most of us mistakenly believe our trustworthiness is obvious. We actually need to signal it more clearly. By the same token, we have to retaliate strongly when our trust is abused. Sending weak signals about our willingness to engage in trust or punish abuse of it makes us more vulnerable to exploitation.

Rule 5: Recognize the other person's dilemma. Because we worry so much about protecting ourselves, we often forget that the people we're dealing with confront their own trust dilemmas and need reassurance about whether (or how much) they should trust us. Good relationship builders are proactive at decreasing the anxiety and allaying the concerns of others.

Rule 6: Look at roles as well as people. A person's role or position can provide a guarantee of his expertise and motivation. But be careful; people on Main Street USA trusted people on Wall Street for a long time because the financial system seemed to be producing reliable results that were the envy of the world.

Rule 7: Remain vigilant and always question. Many people whose trust is abused do conduct their due diligence initially. The trouble is that they don't keep the due diligence up-to-date, because they find that being vigilant and ambivalent about the people they trust is psychologically uncomfortable.

Copyright (c) 2009 Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.

About the Authors

Roderick M. Kramer is a social psychologist and the William R. Kimball Professor of Organizational Behavior at the Stanford Graduate School of Business in Palo Alto, California. His most recent books are Organizational Trust (Oxford University Press, 2006) and, with Karen Cook, Trust and Distrust in Organizations (Russell Sage Foundation, 2004).

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    thensley@...

    07/22/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Rethinking Trust | BNET

    This article evades the foundation of the need to readjust our mind-set and behaviorial habits concerning investments. The trust placed in our Federal Government to watch the investment industry is misplaced. The average citizen does not have the means to investigate large investment firms. Aparently neither do the wealthy.

    The author's statement, "recent financial scandals suggest that people aren't always very smart about whom they trust", is a key indicator that the rest of the article is not worth the 10 seconds used to think about what he was going to write. Proof that Harvard is not always trustworthy.

  •  
    2

    emilwebb

    07/22/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Rethinking Trust | BNET

    Well thank you. Straight from the people who were evaluating how they turned out investment bankers who cooked up this junk.
    These guys are simply greedy shysters with no respect for the financial system, their clients. They deserve acute regulatory attention and heavy handed regulation for the foeseeable future.
    Look, even the worst robber-baron capitalists left business employing many thousands. What do these bums leave?

  •  
    3

    JacquesWerth

    07/22/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Rethinking Trust | BNET

    We have developed a technology for determining the trustworthiness of people within twenty minutes of meeting them. It is highly accurate, but not infallible.

  •  
    4

    Bouchart

    09/07/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Rethinking Trust | BNET

    Trust is dead. Always watch your back.

  •  
    5

    cgreen23

    09/22/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Rethinking Trust | BNET

    I think Kramer is making a very valid point, and drawing some excellent conclusions. Rules 4 and 5, for example, recognize the tight relationship between those who do the trusting, and those who are trusted.

    Still, most of his comments have to do with the nature of trusting. At the risk of over-simplifying, we may have a problem of excessive trusting--but we most certainly have a problem of trustworthiness.

    The main crisis is not one of trusting, but of trustworthiness; we don't need to be more careful of those we trust, we need to demand more of them, and to shame them and punish them when they don't live up to it.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement