• download
  • Print
  • Recommend
  • 7

How to Cut Costs to Avoid Cutting Jobs

Tags: Job, Employee, Hospital, Customer, Worker, Recruitment & Selection, Healthcare, Human Resources, Workforce Management, Job Cuts, FedEx, Wynn Resorts, Marriott International, American Express, Deloitte Consulting, General Motors Corp., Cisco Systems, Jane Hodges

Pick any sector and you’ll find empty offices and barren cubicles: banking, health care, media, technology, retail. All have thrown thousands upon thousands out of the workforce, which is why the nation’s unemployment rate has almost doubled in the past year or so to around 9.5 percent.

Yet you know that blanket job cuts create their own set of problems. They wreck morale among those remaining on your team, and they are all but certain to leave you shorthanded when business finally cycles back up. Plus, there’s the human factor: laying off good people is just about the worst part of managing. This is why you should turn to layoffs only after you’ve tried just about everything else. So before you sign the first of those pink slips, think about these alternatives:

1. Let everyone share the cost-cutting pain.

During this downturn, the CEOs of FedEx, Wynn Resorts, and Marriott International are among the C-Suite execs that have cut their own compensation to show the rank-and-file that they aren’t immune from the bad times. But no one has taken the we’re-in-this-together approach as seriously as Paul Levy, the CEO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.

This year, Levy needed to slash $20 million from his hospital’s budget. The quickest way to reach that goal would have been to dismiss 600 of his 6,500 full-time employees, but Levy was determined not to do that. Levy enlisted his entire staff, from clerical workers to the best-paid doctors, to recommend ways to cut costs and spare jobs. In March, he held town hall-style meetings at which thousands of employees brainstormed and offered up ideas. He set up a Web site chat room for people to discuss suggestions. He invited employees to email him directly, and he wrote about the whole process on his blog, which is called Running a Hospital. “I wanted us to have employee buy-in,” says Levy.

Within just a few weeks, the group had agreed on enough changes that Levy managed to squeeze almost the entire $20 million out of the budget. Ultimately, he still had to cut jobs, but the team effort winnowed the number down to just 70 positions.

The bulk of the savings came from workers offering to take pay cuts. Vice presidents and senior vice presidents, for example, agreed to forgo $1.4 million worth of salary. Employees encouraged the hospital to halt matching 401(k) contributions, which saved another $3.5 million. Some employees gave back recently awarded raises, while others agreed to forgo pay they were owed for time off that they didn’t take. Smaller efforts helped as well. Employees suggested that the hospital stop paying for work-issued BlackBerries, cancel the company picnic, and end catering for staff meetings.

Initially, Levy says his idea was met with surprise by other hospital execs, particularly the CFO. But all were quickly heartened by the sacrifices most employees were willing to endure for the sake of the hospital overall.

2. Fire your customers.

Sometimes, it’s your customers that are costing you too much. The solution: Get rid of them. Early this year American Express sent select customers $300 if they agreed to pay down and close their accounts. In addition, Amex flat-out closed 2.7 million accounts because they had zero balances or had been inactive for two years. For American Express, having “bad” customers — people who frequently fall behind in their payments, or who don’t use their accounts — was impeding its ability to seek and serve the more lucrative ones.

In this economy, companies should take a hard look at firing some of their customers, suggests Frank Burkitt, a lead consultant on Deloitte Consulting’s supply chain and operations practice. The problem, he says, is that when times are good businesses aggressively go after customers to grab market share, even if initially those customers cost them money. But when the economy takes a sudden turn south, they end up saddled with a whole lot of costly customers. The downturn worsens the prospect of those people becoming profitable customers, and continuing to serve them can even cripple a business.

3. Dump costly products.

Companies should ask themselves what else they could jettison besides employees. These days, everything is on the table: entire product lines, real estate, patent portfolios.

Just look at General Motors, which spent 40 days in bankruptcy and got rid of its Hummer and Saturn lines, and is the stronger for it.

Streamlining the business often has unexpected benefits. Burkitt points to the case of a $6 billion U.S. telecom company that cut back its product mix and saw the productivity of its salespeople jump 21 percent. It turned out that the sales reps were more successful when they had fewer options and services to sell. As a result, customer turnover fell by 35 percent.

Figuring out what products to dump requires taking a close look at all the costs associated with each product. The formula is straightforward but needs to be detailed: Take a given product’s revenue and subtract what it costs to bring it to the customer. That includes costs of production, marketing, sales, fulfillment, and customer service. The process can be revealing. “There are always hidden costs that crop up in business and build up over time,” says Burkitt. And measuring something really closely is the first step to figuring out where you can make improvements, save money, and keep your business humming through good times bad.

4. Renegotiate contracts.

When your business is in trouble you’d be foolish not to demand more favorable deals with your vendors and suppliers. So why not your workers? Microsoft in February began cutting pay to the contract workers it hires via outside agencies, lowering existing contractor pay by 10 percent and reducing pay for new contractors by 15 percent. Popular? Not with the workers, some of who have formed a protest site to rant. But in this job market, they have little choice — and it’s better to keep more people working for less money, than have to get by with fewer workers.

When it comes time to negotiate with your vendors, don’t just think about price. If you’re concerned about spending more than you should — and who isn’t? — you might want to take what David Fields, president of Ascendant Consulting, calls an “options approach.” That’s where you pay the vendor different rates for different levels of service. You might, for example, structure your contract so that you pay one amount for on-time delivery for something key to your manufacturing process, yet a lower amount for something less critical. In short, he says, the terms of your contracts should reflect the priorities of your business. “The idea isn’t that you beat up a vendor,” says Fields. “It’s that you make contracts more effective.”

Structuring your vendor relationships this way can save huge amounts and, says Fields, is far more efficient and productive than turning to across-the-board job cuts.

5. Go for cheaper tech.

If your shop needs a tech upgrade but you can’t afford it, consider the cloud. Increasingly, businesses are finding they can do almost all of their computing with free or cheap services that store your data on remote servers — that is, in the cloud. Moreover, there is so much good free software nowadays, including office suites with word processing and spreadsheet software, that this is often a no-brainer. Check out openoffice.org or the increasingly popular applications offered by Google.

Cisco even figured out a way to save on in-house tech-support staff. About a year ago it created a self-serve tech support wiki for its Mac users so they can troubleshoot problems themselves before calling IT. A Cisco spokeswoman says that the wiki has saved the company $1.6 million, and that, thankfully, is more than few annual salaries.

Related BNET articles:

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    S.Howard-Sarin

    08/19/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Cut Costs to Avoid Cutting Jobs

    I sure hope a lot of folks read this.

  •  
    2

    S.Howard-Sarin

    08/19/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Cut Costs to Avoid Cutting Jobs

    On second thought: I should get me whole team to read this!

  •  
    3

    pushen

    08/20/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Cut Costs to Avoid Cutting Jobs

    If I may share the experience of my country, that is, Russia. This method - keep people, cut pay - is very popular with the employers. Why? Because the entrepreneurs depend on the authorities in many ways. They do not give much heck about entrepreneurs but both on the federal and local levels have strong populist concerns and matching ways. So every one seems happy, for the time being.
    However, this is widely criticised by the expert community. The rationale is simple: if a business is distressed (and if it has to cut costs it means that the distress is there, whatever form it takes) it cannot sustain its workforce who has turned significantly less productive. That means that the firing will inevitably take place, only later, and could be yet more painful.
    The bottom line: grievances of unemployed people are understandable and important. But there must be a balance, which is very fine. Otherwise it is entirely wrong as going against the basic rules under which any normal economy runs. It is a variant of concealed unemployment anyway, but it distorts the picture and prevent the translation of the job market monitoring into adequate policy. Which includes the budgeting of sufficient funds to support the out-of-the-job when they eventually arrive to the market, this way or the other.

  •  
    4

    sbollinger6

    08/21/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Cut Costs to Avoid Cutting Jobs

    One question on Amex closing 2.7 million inactive accounts...Amex charges a $50 membership fee each year per account. 2.7 million customers equals $135 million per year in revenue. If these customers did nothing but pay their membership fees for two years, Amex just threw away $270 million in "easy" revenue--revenue with very few costs associated with it. I may be missing something here, but in my day, $270 million dollars was a lot of revenue.

  •  
    5

    hormellr

    08/23/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Cut Costs to Avoid Cutting Jobs

    A few years ago I read an article that focused on companies that had laid off workers and their counterparts in the same industry who had not during "lean" times. The conclusion, as I remember it, was that those companies which retained as many of their employees as possible were significantly more likely to "survive and thrive" as opposed to those who cut employees. Unfortunately, I did not rip the page out of the magazine for future reference.

    My personal experience, as one who was offered a "deal that I couldn't refuse" from the then SBC in 2000, was that within 18 months or so afterwards, a major project in the Yellow Pages division was initiated that required the CEO to go to the chairman of SBC (now the chairman of GM) to get permission to essentially re-hire, as consultants, many of those who left the company, because the original act of "retiring the experienced personnel," had depleted the organization of its expertise in favor of cost savings. To me this was a clear example of a cost containment that went wrong.

  •  
    6

    Andrew McFarland

    08/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Cut Costs to Avoid Cutting Jobs

    All good ideas with exception of #1. However, the example given is actually a good implementation of what is generally a bad idea. Sharing the pain works only when employees believe (1) it is short-term, (2) they will regain lost ground at a later date, and (3) they have a strong corporate culture to stick together.

  •  
    7

    Bouchart

    08/30/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Cut Costs to Avoid Cutting Jobs

    If you wait until a recession to cut costs, you are too late.

  •  
    8

    Smith of Hampshire

    09/02/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Cut Costs to Avoid Cutting Jobs

    It never ceases to amaze me how businesses knee-jerk reaction is to cull people first instead of looking to the biggest source of cost reductions potential in it's business, namely the purchase ledger or procurement costs. In most businesses, procurement costs amount to almost two-thirds of revenue (payroll typically 15%) and with a little ingenuity, playing the market and in some cases collaborating creatively with suppliers, the cost savings that can be generated by savvy procurement can far outweigh the gains of slashing headcount!

  •  
    9

    Jeffp77

    09/30/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Cut Costs to Avoid Cutting Jobs

    sbollinger6,
    I think I can answer your question about why the credit card companies would want to cancel $50/yr "easy revenue". It's all about the books. Those credit cards are considered a liability. So let's say the average credit limit on a card is $10,000. Those 2.7 million cards have a liability of $2.7 Billion. They have to have that much in assets to cover the liability, and the cards aren't even being used. So in order to get new customers that hopefully will use the card, they have to get rid of those liabilities.
    As for getting rid of customers that pay late, I don't agree with that. In all the reports I have read, they indicate that late fees and interest charges are by far greater income for credit card companies than what they receive from retailers.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here