• download
  • Print
  • Recommend
  • 45

Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

Tags: Apple Macintosh, Advertisement, Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Microsoft, Negative Advertising, Brand, Lindsay Blakely

The Move: Apple beefed up ad expenditures to launch an anti-PC ad campaign that blindsided the mighty Microsoft.

Apple spent a whopping $486 million on advertising in 2008 — a figure BNET recently found hiding in the company’s November 10-K filing. But it’s not just the size of the budget that’s noteworthy; it’s how Apple leveraged those ad dollars to attack rival Microsoft and make big gains in market share through its “Get a Mac” campaign. Was it worth the big bucks? You bet, and here’s why.

Negative advertising still prevails in politics because, well, it still works. Not so with consumer products: When commercial brands try to tear each other down, typically neither side wins because consumers find the tactic a turn-off That is, unless you’re Apple. Two years ago, the company launched the “Get a Mac” campaign, a big-budget departure from previous themes. For years, Apple had touted the hardware as the reason to buy the brand. But “Get a Mac” attacked the PC head on by contrasting users — a cool young guy personified the Mac (actor Justin Long), while a pudgy, middle-aged nerd (comedian John Hodgman) represented the PC.

Then, when Microsoft released Windows Vista in 2007 to an unexpected backlash from consumers, Apple had the ideal opportunity to pounce: It quickly retooled the “Get a Mac” campaign using the same hip-cool vs. stodgy-nerd characters to highlight Vista’s problems. Thirty-second spots ridiculed everything from Vista’s hardware requirements to Microsoft’s bungled and pricey attempts to fix the unpopular operating system.

The strategy was not without risk. “That’s a tricky campaign to manage,” says Julie Hennessy, a Northwestern University marketing professor who has worked with Microsoft. “Apple’s campaign is fundamentally speaking to Microsoft users, and yet it makes fun of them.” In addition to the risk of alienating potential buyers, Hennessy adds, even a negative ad automatically gives a rival more exposure.

But the satirical ads turned into a cult success, viewed millions of times on YouTube. Their message drilled down to a single talking point — a Mac is easier to use than a PC — and Microsoft had no ads countering that assertion. “Apple got to define Microsoft,” says Roger Kay, founder and president of the research firm Endpoint Technologies Associates, adding that the negative attacks worked because Apple was simply taking advantage of a competitor’s weaknesses. “There would have been more risk if Apple had been wrong,” he points out. “But instead they capitalized on specific points where Vista was failing.”

Microsoft finally responded to the negative ad cycle in summer 2008. The company launched a $300 million ad campaign featuring comedian Jerry Seinfeld to turn around the negative image of Vista that Apple had helped create. It was the single biggest ad undertaking in Microsoft history. When announcing the Seinfeld campaign, company officials reportedly admitted that the Windows brand “has grown stale and has been battered by” the Apple ads, according to the Wall Street Journal. However, Microsoft aired just two ads, pulling the campaign after it met with critical reviews. Microsoft’s ads now respond directly to Apple’s attacks by defending “I’m a PC” users.

In the meantime, technology market research firm IDC reports that Apple grabbed more than 8 percent of the U.S. market for desktops and laptops in Q3, up from 7.3 percent the prior year. Apple now ranks as the third largest PC maker in the U.S., behind Dell and Hewlett-Packard. Last year Apple ranked fourth in the U.S. market. The ads “definitely paid off for them,” says Endpoint’s Kay. “It cost Microsoft a lot when they didn’t respond [quickly enough] to them.”

Whether or not it’s accurate to attribute that gain to the ad campaign, it’s notable that, unlike many companies, Apple will enter 2009 in a strong position. The company’s revenues for Q4, which ended September 30, were $7.895 billion, up from $6.22 billion for the previous year. Apple’s net profit jumped from $904 million to $1.14 billion. Compared with 2007, Apple’s desktop sales were up 39 percent, laptop sales were up 38 percent, software and services revenues rose 46 percent, and peripherals revenues were up 32 percent in the 2008 fiscal year — all product categories that benefitted from the “Get a Mac” campaign. Plus, according to research group NPD, Apple now owns more than a 60 percent share of the retail market for desktop and laptop computers selling for over $1,000.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Brett11

    12/04/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    Microsoft's ads were horrible. Jerry Seinfeld was UNFUNNY and looked like a MORON in the ads. The first time I saw the ad I was in disbelief. What the hell were they talking about? What was Seinfeld muttering? What was the point? It was insulting to watch, and I'm a Microsoft fan! When he interacted with Bill Gates I felt embarrassed for everyone involved. Seinfeld is a hack and way past his prime, he should retire with some shred of dignity left.

  •  
    2

    tom.moore@...

    12/04/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    After almost 20 years of putting up with Microsoft's OS, I thought outside the box. In fact, I got rid of the box and bought an iMac.

    In fact, I hadn't seen the negative ads until a (long time Mac-user friend sent me a couple of links. Every version of the MS OS led us users deeper into frustration.

    The frosting on the Mac purchase was that I also received a new iPod Touch because I was registered at the local college. (Thank you, Steve).

    That was March of this year and no regrets.

  •  
    3

    larsonjs

    12/04/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    I thought the Apple Ads were a cheap shot, but they were effective. I guess alls fair in love, war, politics, and business. My admiration of apple went down considerably. If their product is as good as they say it is, why do they need to tear down the competition. We have two MACs in an office of 18 PCs and have not noticed a difference in down time or productivity. In graphics they shine, in real work, they are average at best.

  •  
    4

    recruit1

    12/04/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    I agree that tearing down the competition really is never the best way. It may result in the 'cool" factor in this case, but in the long haul it may not buy the company any better market image. People really don't buy Macs or PCs based only upon the wow factor.

    And say what you will of Microsoft, their ads have never denigrated the competition.

  •  
    5

    gaiagraphics

    12/04/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    We're a graphics company with several Macs and two
    lonely PCs. All the Macs work well; one purchased in
    1999 is still able to run Adobe Creative Suite CS3 and
    OS 10.4 software. The PCs - one with Vista and one
    with Windows XP - are slow and buggy. I think people
    who like PCs just do not have enough hands-on
    experience with Macs. They must be used to windows
    popping up all the time, and glitches happening
    regularly. Those things just don't happen on the Mac.
    So it's easy to make fun on PCs because Microsoft is
    like the emperor with no clothes.

  •  
    6

    nzcalling@...

    12/04/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    Microsoft Operating Systems run fine. . . . . until you start installing applications. My PC recently had some hardware problems & I mistakenly thought it was software related. After re-installing the operating system & then fixing the harware problem I noted how quick & stable the machine was. I decided there & then to not install any applications on my machine unless absolutely necessary. I now run a bare bones XP machine with just Google Picasa, Limewire & MSOffice. The machine really runs well. I think one of the reasons that Apple machines give fewer problems is that there are fewer third party software applications to interfere with the machines smooth operations.

  •  
    7

    daveroeser

    12/04/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    I love my PC's...I just don't use windozes...I have been running FreeBSD, Kubuntu, and Gentoo for a number of years.

    However, the others (wife and kids) all switched to Macs a couple of years ago and they were fight instead of using windozes again.

  •  
    8

    stevenkwyant@...

    12/04/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    Apple gets away with negative ads because they do it with an almost apologetic style. The Mac character in the ads appears as truly empathetic to the PC character, so it comes off as Apple almost being embarrassed at how easy it is to poke fun at MS foibles. Mac also is perceived as the little guy fighting against a much bigger adversary (David vs Goliath). It's perfect leveraging of the brands.

    BTW, graphics IS real work.

  •  
    9

    chimambo

    12/05/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    The Mac may be good, on funcy graphics. But most office workers do real work and the PC does very well. And assuming the Mac go as popular as the Pc and more third party software installed. I know without a doubt that we will be telling a different story.

  •  
    10

    bthomas829

    12/05/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    Gosh, when did this turn into a slam on graphics not being real work? I should probably tell my employer that they are paying me for fake work...

  •  
    11

    dtpnola

    12/05/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    One of the best advertising campaigns of all time. Microsoft's "I'm a PC" rebuttal was good, but late and trumped by Apple with their own rebuttal. Well done, well played, and well timed by Apple.

  •  
    12

    dryheat45

    12/05/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    Hmmm, I didn't really see this so much as a negative ad attack but rather more of an apples (pun intended) to oranges comparison of the OS of the two most well known brands in the industry. The Microsoft side of the ad was a nerdy and very businesslike representation which clicked with Windows users because that is what Microsoft is known for; it is the Office Suite that is the most used and best-known in the business world. Being a nerd isn't necessarily cool, but these are the people that get things done. The Apple side is saying yes I'm young and the OS is better known for oustanding graphic applications, but guess what? I can run Microsoft Office so you can be professional and cool at the same time. The fact that Microsoft did what Microsoft always does, which is release a buggy OS and worry about the details later was a bonus to Apple since their OS is rock solid. I have to agree that because Microsoft OS is the most popular on the market, it makes it more susceptible to system attacks and applications that slow down processes, but that is also an advantage to Apple. If there is anything that Microsoft should learn from this ad campaign, it is that forcing people to use an OS that isn't ready will kill them in the end. The biggest advantage Microsoft holds is that the PC is more affordable than most MAC's. If Steve Jobs ever decides to expand the Leopard OS (or something similiar) into the PC world, Microsoft will find themselves in a world of hurt.

  •  
    13

    truckin.duck

    12/05/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    I guess I bought two MacBooks in the quarter in question. To be fair I left apple a generation ago but came back for a simple reason of performance. Under the hood is some classy technology... but in front of me is a large screen running XP faster than my Fujitsu Lifebook and on the right is the Mac OS X with all its stuff... To be fair I have not had time to figure out the innards of the Mac OS but it sure does a burner with the Microsoft Virtual Machine. Impressive... and very reliable (I use VMware Fusion).

  •  
    14

    MightyCaseyMedia

    12/05/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    As cool as the Apple crew is, ad-wise, until they move past the 'you're not smart enough to know what's going on inside' approach to the software they allow to run on their OS, they'll still be letting MS dominate the market. I started an Apple devotee, but when I had to transition to a laptop in the late 80s, Powerbooks were $6K, while IBM clones running Win 3.1 were under $2.5K. $3.5K seemed an excessive 'cool tax' at the time, and the price differential still keeps me in the PC zone, particularly considering the software I depend on is still somewhat squirrely on Mac OSs.

    I guess I'll never be cool. But I am, at least most of the time, productive.

    Now, if I could just get past the lengthy WinXP boot-up time...!

  •  
    15

    thedudeistoocool@...

    12/07/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    The article states that "Apple is now the third largest PC maker in the US" As far as I know there are asolutley 0 Apple products made in the US. I believe they are all made in China (as are most non Apple computers) If I could find a computer actually manufactured entirely in the US it would be the one I would buy - regardless of O.S.

  •  
    16

    ndlicht1

    12/07/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    Apple is a genious in taking on Microsoft as they did. They know their audience and went right for the jugular or should I say anger over Vists and its being stufffed down our throats.

    My laptop came with Vists and the manufacturer is not "licensed" so they said, to change my os to XP. I hate Vista's clunkyness and the fact that it did not work with manyb of the devices that I sell or use. I replaced it and installed the XP and the downloaded drivers needed to run on my laptop. Its clunky but better than Vista.

    Vista had alienated me to my Laptop and the Manufacturer of it. A senior person at my laptop manufacturer told me that they could not change me to XP and had no choice due to licensing.

    I told my laptop supplyer that I their unwillingness to give me XP resulted in an entire company wide decision never to buy their brand again.

    Think I would relate to apples campaign? Definately!

  •  
    17

    ahmedosman1969

    12/09/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    Actually, I think what Apple did was very smart. The created their message around Apple and the Mac. If you look at all those ads,. each had a message, "simplicity, it just works, security, usability etc." The defined what their product stood for and also defined all the shortcomings of the PC and by virtue Windows Vista.

    For as big and smart as Microsoft is, they should have responded immediately. Unfortunately, they ignored their competition and let them define them....not good marketing & brand strategy.

  •  
    18

    Sdmchan

    12/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    The Mac ads make me want to scream. I am of the "techie" generation but I never thought that I should poke fun at people and be a jerk who thinks they are more intelligent than anyone else just because I use a different machine. Although I like the reliability and power of a Mac, I hate the selfish attitude that the commercials convey. Sadly, many of my Mac-using friends have the same "better than you" attitude as the guy in the commercials. It may be a wise marketing decision but our society does not need more people buying things because they want to feel more intelligent than others.

  •  
    19

    nick2design

    12/11/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    I would agree, graphics stuff is not real work (sarcasm). I
    only get paid for building graphic user interfaces,
    information architecture, and web development (and
    websites)... all while using a mac (a fake work maker).
    These types of projects can sell from anywhere between
    10k to 500k. But I guess that is not real work. Sorry, just
    upsets me when people say graphics are not "real" work.
    People/Companies hire out for graphics (and the ideas
    behind them) in many situations, hmmm, I guess because
    it is real work.

    Anyways, Miller Lite also tried a (one of many) negative
    add campaign on Bud Light a few years back. They had
    these Miller refs show up at a party and replace
    everybody's Bud Light with Miller light. The rebuttal from
    Bud Light was clever. They basically depicted what
    happened after Miller refs "confiscated" the Bud Light. It
    showed the refs all going back to their place and drinking
    the Bud Light they took. It just reminds me of the same opportunity that Microsoft could have had... but did not
    push what they are currently showing far enough. If you
    have not seen them, look into them. They are pretty
    funny.

  •  
    20

    MatJFitz

    12/29/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    I am extremely impressed with the Apple ads. I was slightly stunned when I first saw them but very very impressed. There is a smugness about them which somehow avoids disengaging the audience (could it be as simple as that catchy background music?). This ad appeals to status and to practicality - how many advertising campaigns can claim that?

    Apple have highlighted what they see as their competitive advantage. They've taken the standard "look at this feature on our product" and turned it into "look at how our competitor doesn't have the same features as our product." Very simple.

    Also - I don't see this as "grabbing the jugular" by design. The conversation you would have with a friend regarding the question - should I buy a Mac or upgrade my PC - would inevitably include the points: 1) vista is riddled with problems, MS are trying to advertise it away but it's not working and 2)A PC upgrade isn't a straight-forward event. These ads have the very some 'conversation' with every prospective buyer.

    Microsoft's counter punch was soft at best. I don't think the Jerry Seinfeld advertisement made it to Australian TV, but the "I'm a PC" ad was terrible. It only addressed the issue of status which is missing the fundamental strength that Apple have. The 'coolness' is a peripheral.

    I believe other negative campaigns fail because the competitive advantage is subjective or not clear enough. They basically say "we are better because we say we are".

    Very interesting article and comments. Thanks everyone.

  •  
    21

    mista nik

    02/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    The irony of the situation is that Microsoft hit back with it's 'I'm a PC', ad schtick (a pc is for everybody) whilst the target market of the Apple is probably going to be one of the markets that will be worst hit by the current economic climate (young, trendy professionals).

  •  
    22

    wchinganda

    03/11/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Apple: The Perfectly Timed Negative Ad Campaign

    Way to go Microsoft..why would you choose a very unfunny character like Jerry Seinfield.. you need to ask yourself the question..has he ever sold out a show?? absolutely not but used to have many viewers who were probably not the same people that read intellectual readings as these..American Capitalism..see exactly why it fails..

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)