BNET Basics

  • download
  • Print
  • Recommend
  • 46

Recruit Like the Pros

Tags: Talent, Job, Southwest Airlines Co., Federal Express, Starbucks Corp., Candidate, Recruitment & Selection, Workforce Management, Human Resources, Brian Libby, Applicant, Business, Recruitment &Amp, Selection, BNET Feature

Resumes and interviews form the bedrock of a successful hire, but many companies supplement the standard question-and-answer format with creative techniques that allow potential star employees to shine. Here's how five companies have reinvented the interview process.

Google: The Talent Show

At its offices all over the world, Google holds events designed to help the company connect with local talent. One, targeted at math and computer specialists, is called a Code Jam. "We invite a bunch of people to participate in a three- to four-hour coding competition," says hiring director Arnnon Geshuri. "They sit in a big room together, so you can see how people approach questions." The top 100 finishers are invited back to apply for a job. In India, Google sponsored an essay contest that attracted applicants from around the country. In addition to connections with creative thinkers, the gesture generated plenty of positive publicity. "We're not really about job fairs," Geshuri says. "We try to come up with interesting environments where people can be their best."

Starbucks Coffee: See the Product, Love the Product

At Starbucks Coffee's headquarters in Seattle, candidates don't have to worry about being sufficiently caffeinated, but it helps to have a coffee palate. "We often conduct brief coffee tastings," says Carmen Hudson, Starbucks Coffee's staffing manager for global strategic sourcing. "It allows candidates to experience a bit of Starbucks culture, emphasizes our core product, and provides a break for candidates between interviews." Of course not every company sells coffee, but the point is to put the candidate in direct contact with the brand or product to gauge their levels of familiarity and comfort.

Southwest Airlines: The Always-On Interview

If you're flying Southwest Airlines to interview at the company's Dallas headquarters, be sure to turn on the charm as soon as you enter the airport. Although it's not official company policy, flight attendants and other Southwest employees often submit comments about job candidates to those in charge of making the hire. A unique mix of southern hospitality and northern wisecracking is the hallmark of Southwest's corporate culture, particularly among those who serve the public. If you don't have it, other Southwest workers are likely notice. "If one of our employees is impressed, or not so impressed, after talking with a candidate on a flight, they let us know," says Amy Webb, manager of employment in Southwest's People department. "They give us feedback proactively."

FedEx: Computerized Matching

Many large companies that hire on a regular basis now use clever online software that screens and filters applicants before scheduling interviews. FedEx has introduced a career center on its website that allows applicants to post their resume and receive pointers to the jobs that best match their experience and skills. "It's all about providing the communication, understanding, and education applicants need—just like we would for our customers," says FedEx director of recruitment John Leech.

Microsoft: Gazing into the Crystal Ball

Microsoft sometimes invites candidates to ponder the future as a way to look for people who understand the strategic challenges the company faces. "One of our online media businesses asked candidates what they thought the future of online music looked like, and how teens would be using the Net ten years from now," recalls Scott Pitasky, Microsoft's general manager of recruiting. Other questions include asking candidates to name companies that they consider best at customer experience, and what Microsoft could learn from them.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    AjiNIMC

    04/26/07 | Report as spam

    A blog can help too

    Also you can check the people who are participating in your blog. This will help you find the people interested in your company.

  •  
    2

    Publisher1

    01/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Recruit Like the Pros

    We 'banned the interview' in our business (mostly). Initial applicants are invited to complete a questionnaire which includes some of the usual interview questions, and some relevant creativity or job related questions. Most people don't bother answering -- so we just look at the ones who do. These candidates get a brief phone intervview, and then either an independently administered test (for salespeople) and if they do well, a one-to-three day paid working assignment relevant to the job. The latter assignment is where we really see if they fit in with the business. In this environment, resumes and interviews are truly secondary resources.

  •  
    3

    saumnike

    01/11/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Recruit Like the Pros

    I really like the way Google does its interviewing session. But how can one learn about a person in a matter of "Coding Event" or and Essay Contest. There should be someway to also learn about the personality of the candidate. I'm sure none of these firms would be looking for someone who can go and invent the next best thing in their firm, all they are looking for is to fill a everyday role (Unlike NASA, where you are building the next space vehicle to Saturn). So in a nutshell, you are looking for a "PERSON" not a candidate. So to understand one's personality you have to have sessions like wise.

    - Saum

  •  
    4

    darinp

    01/11/08 | Report as spam

    Code Jam is just the first screen

    You should never base your selection on a single event, especially if it is an interview. The Google methods mentioned are merely initial screens. The top people are invited to apply, they are not chosen for employment. The process from there should include a phone interview, live interview, and possibly a team interview at the very least.

  •  
    5

    jeffrey.nazeck@...

    01/11/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Recruit Like the Pros

    I've been applying the Microsoft practice for 2 years and find it to be very helpful in the selection process. The forward thinking (prepared) candidates become exhilarated by the questions while the ill prepared candidates act surprised.

    This method has resulted in successfuly hiring 2 senior level engineers that excel at their profession as well as quickly being accepted by tenured staff.

    Weeding through resumes, interviewing and selecting top candidates is time consuming, therefore the quicker you can get to your short list, the better it is for you, the candidate and your Company.

    I recommend this approach to all hiring managers.

  •  
    6

    darinp

    01/11/08 | Report as spam

    Google's Code Jam process is best

    Google does an exceptional job of seeing candidates' actual performance. The people participating in the Code Jam are under some duress, they must seek clarification on the instructions (what do the users really want?), and they must produce actual work that is relevant and related to what they will be hired for. It is the ultimate job simulation!

    The best selection methodology that I have ever seen in film does something similar. In case you have forgotten, check out the process that Will Smith went through in order to become one of the Men in Black. When he drags the table over in order to complete the written assessment I knew he was the one for the job!

    Happy hiring,

    Darin Phillips
    author of the human capital management blog on blogger.com

  •  
    7

    RandyU

    01/11/08 | Report as spam

    RE: Recruit Like the Pros

    RE: FedEx

    You may consider on-line application and screening "clever". I must completely disagree. Most of those systems are so archaic, cumbersome,and many times fraught with errors. All can I conclude is that they are some cobbled together software/IT systems. I also happen to know from that from inside a company they can be just as awkward and useless. Many times they are frightfully expensive for a company to purchase and implement.

    Many I have visited are also a case study in bad - no - horrible web design (my field).

    I CANNOT imagine that this type of system results in getting the best candidate for the job. The best of the best will not bother with this backward method of geting into a company.

    I equate these on-line application systems with the annoying extended phone trees we have all experienced. Bad idea that drives off customers and the online application drives off potentially valuable employees. I have applied on-line and the process was long and some even required me to supply social security numbers, and other personal information - just to apply!

    Large companies can acutally use humans to screen candidates. I have seen it done, and the result is a company gets the best people in their industry. You are dealing with people - not bank accounts - and people will respond better to human contact rather than an awkward, faceless, and probably flawed web application process.

    One last note. I have used such sites to get 3 jobs, so either I am not a great employee, or the system indeed does work. The system resulted in someone like me, that rants like this, being hired. You decide if the process works.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

Click Here
advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement