BNET Crash Course

How to Conduct a Job Interview

Tags: Job, Job Interview, Interview, Candidate, Bill Tolbert, Recruitment & Selection, Human Resources, Workforce Management, Brian Libby, Hiring, Team Management, Crash Course

Got a key position to fill? Hiring good employees is the foundation of any successful business. But selecting the right ones is hard work, and the interview process is often the most important step in the process. Here's how to figure out if the candidate sitting across from you is likely to become your next Employee of the Month.

Things you will need:

  • None—unless it's offsite, in which case the employer picks up any tab.
  • Figure at least 45 minutes per interview.
  • A clean, well-lighted place: Windowless conference rooms don't foster honest dialogue. Consider meeting in your own office or at an off-site coffee shop.
  • Multiple interviewers: Several members of your team should meet key hires. The more perspective you get on the candidate, the smarter your decision will be.
  • Note-taking materials: It could be a pen and paper or a laptop and digital recorder, but don't rely on memory alone to track responses.
  • A plan: Know the order in which you'll proceed with questions and how they'll be divided up among team members.
  • download
  • Print
  • Recommend
  • 84

Do Your Homework Beforehand

Goal: Minimize the back-story and maximize the time you spend with the candidate.

Going into an interview, each interviewer should have already studied a dossier on the person they're about to meet face to face. At the very least, become familiar enough with his or her resume, cover letter, or other submitted materials so you don't waste the first half of the interview re-learning basic biographical information.

Make sure you have the information you need to get a sense of what each candidate is all about—and what they might bring to the position—before you conduct the actual interview. Google, a company that prides itself on its creative approach to the hiring process, uses tailored questionnaires that candidates answer online. Given that it's a tech company, many of the questions are, well, technical. One candidate was asked to design a system that would produce a report of the top 1 million Google search requests—using only custom-written applications and free open-source software. Other Google questions seek out extracurricular experience: answers have included accounts of climbing mountains and writing novels. "If we find individuals who have done interesting things, they seem to make a better connection with the community here," says Google staffing director Arnnon Geshuri.

Increasingly, blogs and websites like MySpace and Facebook are making it easy to learn a wealth of personal information about people, even though those sites were not posted with you in mind—and may have no bearing whatsoever on a candidate's job fitness. "We regard that as a personal thing, and we don't seek it out," says General Electric recruitment manager Steve Canale. "But I tell my children, 'Don't put anything out there you don't want everybody to be able to see.'" Candidates who learn that their personal websites have been weighed along with their resume may be angered by the invasion of privacy and the irrelevance to the job. An honorable rule of thumb is to ask in advance if the candidate has any online presence they'd like you to check out.

Danger! Danger! Danger!

Keeping It Legal

The interview process is subject to numerous employment laws designed to protect applicants' privacy and ensure them a fair shot in the selection process. Employers cannot ask questions about religion, national origin, age, height, weight, marital status, disability, or gender unless they represent genuine qualifications essential to the operation of the business. (For example: a church can ask potential ministers about their religious background; a contracting firm can ask if candidates are physically able to perform certain tasks.)

No one should be required to provide personal information, and some in the employment field recommend keeping the interview process tied strictly to job relevance. If asking about off-hours pursuits, say so in an open-ended way, such as, "We're seeking well-rounded, passionate people. Is that how you'd characterize yourself?"

Beware the Three-minute Judgment

Goal: Choose the best person for the job—not your new best friend.

It's human nature to base your opinion about a candidate on the gut feeling you develop during the first few minutes of the interview. To some extent, that tendency can be harnessed as a kind of intrinsic sixth sense. But have faith in the process as a whole. Many of the best employees might not make a great first impression, but their talent reveals itself more and more over time.

"When I've done training for interviewing, I've noticed that people fantasize about the concept of having a buzzer under the desk that you could push to say, 'No thank you,'" says industrial psychologist Charles Handler of Rocket-Hire.com, a firm that advises companies on their hiring processes. "But you need to think, before you hit that imaginary buzzer, why do you want to hit it? You have to suspend judgment and think about collecting data that will help you make a good decision in the end."

Handler adds that for the most part, people want to hire people like themselves. "The key is reducing subjectivity and making the process more job related," he says. Remember: you want to create a team with a true diversity of personalities, perspectives, and talents. That's crucial to keep in mind when biographical details related to hobbies, cultural tastes, and other outside pursuits come up. If you're too easily swayed by your shared passion for Harry Potter books or old David Bowie albums, you're not going to focus properly on concrete, practical information about aptitude and suitability. For a more detailed discussion of how not to conduct a job interview, read about the "10 Mistakes Managers Make During Job Interviews."

Case Study

The Anthropologist in You

Despite having been founded only a few years ago, the New Seasons grocery chain in Portland, Oregon, has nine stores and is continuing to grow quickly. The company focuses on organic produce and products geared toward sustainable living, and it's often praised for the conspicuous good cheer of its employees—it's the kind of attitude you just can't fake with a robotic smile and generic "Have a nice day." Head recruiter Bill Tolbert is trained as a cultural anthropologist, and he says the key is to look for people who want to be there. So when conducting interviews, he works hard to form a sense of candidates' lives, their personalities, what matters to them, and how the company fits into that picture.

"I don't see it as an interview so much as a conversation," he says. "I steer away from conventional questions and open up the floor. I just want them to talk about things they're interested in and what they love to do. It could be snowboarding, going to museums—anything. I listen not to what they're saying but to the message behind it."

Tolbert recommends taking notice of the attitude a prospective employee shows in talking about his or her favorite pursuits, be they career, hobby, or something in between. How does the job they're seeking fit? Does their attitude change when the subject comes back to the job? For some, there is an even-keel attitude that traverses work and play. For others, work is a waiting game until it's time to clock out. Tolbert says he looks for someone who has a vibrant, balanced life outside work but doesn't put a mental fence between work and play. "We can teach people to a large degree," Tolbert says. "But what you can't do is change a person."

Ask Plenty of Behavioral Questions

Goal: Keep the interview rooted in practical, job-related skills and information.

Behavioral questions require candidates to give examples from their past experience and describe how they used specific skills that are relevant to the job. They're a great opportunity for candidates to demonstrate leadership or other desirable kinds of performance. An applicant may make statements like, "I deliver great customer service," but that's meaningless unless they can provide a concrete example showing how they walked the talk.

A good interviewer should be able to sift through the information a candidate provides to see what it really says about experience and ability. For example, anecdotes should show balance in a candidate's sense of his own importance. "A candidate shouldn't try to take all the credit for work done in a team," says Brant Williams, recruiting coordinator for Adidas America. "Instead, you want them to clearly identify what their role was and how they contributed to the team outcome." Dissecting the meaning of what's said will require close attention, so write down any responses that give you pause, as well as the good ones.

Hot Tip

Sample Behavior-Based Questions

  • If you're looking for leadership: "Tell me about a time when you accomplished something significant that wouldn't have happened if you hadn't been there to make it happen."
  • If you're looking for communication: "Describe a situation where you persuaded team members to do things your way. What was the effect?"
  • If you're looking for customer service: "Tell me about a time when you had to deal with an irate customer."

From "Fifty Behavior Based Interview Questions"

Throw 'Em a Curveball

GOAL: Get candidates to think on their feet.

Although the majority of the interview should be practical, throwing a more abstract question with no right or wrong answer into the mix can shed light on a candidate's reasoning power, outlook, and comfort in negotiating ambiguity. Asked why the sky is blue, a strong candidate might pontificate about the science of climate and atmosphere or its more conceptual impact on people, culture, and art. "You want people who think differently from each other," says Scott Pitasky, general manager of recruiting for Microsoft. "Otherwise you'll end up with a group of very talented people who always come up with the same answer as each other." Such questions can also be a measure of attitude. If a candidate rolls her eyes and shrugs, she may balk at more important tasks, as well.

For Example

Why Microsoft Loves Manholes

One of Microsoft's abstract questions of choice has long been, "Why are manhole covers round?" One longtime employee, Brian Groth, has posted a list of his favorite answers on his blog:

  • Because the hole is round (duh!)
  • Because animals dig round holes, so it feels natural to humans, too.
  • Because a circle offsets the straight lines of a city.
  • Because it's easier to roll the cover some distance than carry it.
  • Because it won't fall into the hole—but, the same is true for an equilateral triangle.
  • Because it is easier to pour hot metal into a circular mold than one with sharp corners.

Maintain Consistency Across the Process

GOAL: Create a system for quantifying and analyzing the information you collect.

Philosophies about hiring come and go: experience versus raw talent, leaders versus team-players, personality tests and problem-solving scenarios versus traditional resumes and interviews. As with a stock portfolio, your best bet is to diversify. But once you've arrived at a set of questions to ask and qualities to look for, stick to your game plan. Using the same list of questions for all candidates helps create a structure for managing all the information provided in their responses. Just like on an episode of Iron Chef or Dance Fever, members of the interview team can then score candidates on each answer. Of course the job doesn't automatically have to be awarded to the highest scorer, but being able to compare parallel responses is a revealing measurement tool.

Technically Speaking

To Tape or Not To Tape?

Consider recording the interview. Using a video camera may intimidate the candidate or make your company seem a little too much like Big Brother. But many companies, including Xerox and Verizon, are now conducting initial interviews by telephone, and this is a natural time to record the proceedings. The recorded audio provides a chance to revisit any answers you might have missed the first time. Or, for decision makers with a scheduling conflict, interviews can be conducted by someone else at the company and listened to later. Either way, give full disclosure by making sure the candidate is aware the interview is being recorded.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    mschwab@...

    02/15/07 | Report as spam

    Messed up page

    I was so excited to hear about this new feature section, but was very disappointed when I couldn't read it! The text is all messed up, both in Firefox and IE. It's all squashed together at the top of the page.

  •  
    2

    leslieleite@...

    02/15/07 | Report as spam

    Page difficulties

    A couple of users have pointed to problems with viewing text on this page. Sorry for the problems -- we think it was a temporary issue, and hope you'll try to view the page again. I've checked it in both Firefox and Internet Explorer and it appears to be working fine now.

    If the page still can't be read, can one of you let me know which version of IE you're using?

    Thanks,
    Leslie Leite
    BNET Staff

  •  
    3

    fcapobianco

    02/15/07 | Report as spam

    Priorities

    The article highlights some valuable, albeit, basic and obvious issues. The casual and kinky graphics in which it is presented on your web page however makes it difficult for me to relate the value to the importance of the subject. I shy away from organization who want "to have fun." While a good sense of humor may be an admirable attribute at a party, it is out of place to joke around in the workplace. I am not sure the graphic designer for this article understood the real intent of the author--or at least I hope not. It is my belief that the interaction between a candidate and a recruiter is, or should be, a serious event. Kidding around by either one or the other would seem inappropriate.

  •  
    4

    JT HR Guy

    10/18/07 | Report as spam

    Re: Priorities

    Humor is okay at a party? This is one of the problems with the American workplace today. When we talk about work/life balance it just isn't 'at work' versus 'everything else' -- it is the quality of the work environment.

    I would rather work with an average employee with a good sense of humor than a genius who thinks every decision impacts the future of humanity.

    Yes, there is a time to be serious, but in 100 years -- what difference does it really make? (With apologies to Stan Freeburg).

  •  
    5

    ollyl@...

    02/15/07 | Report as spam

    Interviewing

    An excellent article. All of the concepts identify most of the qualifiers needed to make a reasoned judgement. Probably more important is the extent the interviewer(s) development of their viewpoint on what makes the ideal candidate.

    Is it talent, 'fit' with the company culture, level of self determinism, or a set of qualities that will make a unique contribution to the mix?

    Good material to read.

    Ollie Lind

  •  
    6

    leslieleite@...

    02/15/07 | Report as spam

    Problems viewing page

    A couple of users have pointed to problems with viewing text on this page. Sorry for the problems -- we think it was a temporary issue, and hope you'll try to view the page again. I've checked it in both Firefox and Internet Explorer and it appears to be working fine now.

    Thanks,
    Leslie Leite
    BNET Staff

  •  
    7

    lutetia3d-web@...

    02/16/07 | Report as spam

    While useful, these tips are US Centric

    Remember that in an international world, the US rules do not always apply. Both interviewers and candidates should be aware of differing norms and be prepared to be flexible. In many countries, questions about a person's age, marital status, or general interests are not only legal, but are a standard part the interview process. In France one's handwriting is often analysed and it is normal to have have already seen the candidate's photograph on his/her CV. Cultural norms and ways of "knowing" differ. Thus, the information gleaned from asking such questions is not necessarily interpreted in the same way as it would be in the US.

  •  
    8

    devon@...

    01/13/08 | Report as spam

    How to respond?

    I've heard about the French using handwriting analysis. It's odd that people normally so sensible would rely on such nonsense, though there may be groups in the US that do this too. How does one respond to a request for something like a handwriting sample if you know that this kind of "analysis" is pseudo-science?

  •  
    9

    darreno

    04/04/07 | Report as spam

    Classy move!

    I would definitely trust the opinion of someone that pulls a classy move like this. Give me a break.

  •  
    10

    kriggs

    04/26/07 | Report as spam

    Heeelarious!

    Funniest comment I've ever read. Well done!

  •  
    11

    irene g.

    09/23/07 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Conduct a Job Interview

    Great material! After reading it, I went over the policies and procedures I am proposing for one of out training programs.

  •  
    12

    ganeshfedex2007

    01/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Conduct a Job Interview

    this is a well thought off article and applies to all levels of recruitment. Especially to the entry stages. Thanks for sharing.

    Ganesh Prasad, Director Sales - Lufthansa Services Group

  •  
    13

    mchall@...

    01/10/08 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Conduct a Job Interview

    Thnaks for this freebie AND a very useful one too
    Training managers fro recruitment of their staff is an essential tool for success and this article will be part of that training package
    Michael Hall Ph.D
    Director Operations
    Apollo Hospital Dhaka Bangladesh

  •  
    14

    elorm

    01/11/08 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Conduct a Job Interview

    Very useful information. I just started my own business, and your tips really come in handy. Continue the good work.
    Elorm
    From Ghana.

  •  
    15

    darinp

    01/11/08 | Report as spam

    Blended Approaches Work Best

    There is enough research dating back to the seminal 1984 study that everyone and their dog replicated in the mid-1990's to show that traditional selection techniques such as interviews are very poor at predicting performance. If you have a structured interview it increases the likelihood that the final candidate will be a solid performer, but that increase is only from 14% to 24%. Yes, you are better off flipping a coin or having the candidates compete in a rock-paper-scissors elimination tournament...

    From my human capital management blog:
    "There are some inherent problems with using "predictors" of suitability for open positions within a company. Hunter and Hunter (1984) showed that interviewing is certainly one of the least valid predictors of future job performance (a validity coefficient of .14). Using such things as reference checks (.26), education (.22) or biographical data (.37) did not improve the odds too favorably. In fact, even the best predictor, test scores, came out at .57. So, one could make the argument that in order to be able to best predict future job performance of any person, a combination of methods should be used. Hunter, J.E. and Hunter, R.F. 1984. "Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance". .Psychological Bulletin. 96:72-98
    Additional research, including Campion, Campion & Hudson, 1994; Huffcutt and Arthur, 1994; Huffcutt, Roth et al, 1996; and McDaniel et al, 1994, continued to show structured interviews having a maximum validity coefficient of .24. One of the most-embraced contemporary personality assessments, the Big 5, was found in Mount and Barrick's 1995 meta-analytic study to have a coefficient of .18 (uncorrected) for Conscientiousness. There is no silver bullet.

    The best approach starts with an analysis of the critical knowledge, skill, and personal trait components that will drive success in the position based on the responsibilities of the role today and in the immediate future. You can do that by taking the current or next set of performance objectives and a group of top performers and asking the performers to identify the exact activities that one would need to perform in order to reach the stated objectives. Then have that same group break each activity down into the competencies that one would need to have in order to do that activity right and well. The resulting list of competencies will include some that you should hire for because you are not going to expend any training dollars on improving them. Examples would include basic computer skills (commodity knowledge and skill) and listening skills (hard-wired personal trait that won't be corrected through training). Prioritize the items in the selection pool and find ways to pull examples of the desired traits out of each candidate through a combination of several steps that are consistently asked of every candidate. I recommend starting with a phone interview that hits some basic information and asks the candidate what they know about your industry, company, and the role (i.e. did they care enough to do a little homework). Then schedule the candidate for a simulation of the role. Send the candidate a packet of background information for the simulation and have an incumbent for the position being applied for call the candidate at the scheduled time. The incumbent should score each candidate using the same grading sheet that they have been trained to use. I often have the candidate immediately send an email as well that summarizes the call as if they were in the role and logging the call in the customer's record (to check out spelling, grammar, and insight). Finally, the top candidates according to the scores from the phone interview, simulation, and email summary are invited to participate in a behavioral interview with the hiring manager. This manager has been trained to ask and score the responses to a pre-defined set of questions that ask about a previous time when some desired traits were exhibited. If the position relies heavily on some aptitude (e.g. sales) then a reliable and validated assessment may also be used as an additional point of measurement. However, such a tool should not be the main or only deciding factor. It must be a single point of data amongst many!

    More points and ideas are available on my blogger.com human capital management site.

  •  
    16

    esp6952

    01/11/08 | Report as spam

    References

    I would also like to get some input/recommendations on the best way to approach follow up with a candidate's references.

    thanks

  •  
    17

    garcia789

    04/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: How to Conduct a Job Interview

    Hi,

    A very smart and diplomatic answer. It is really appreciable and generous

    Gracia


    Cv interview questions

  •  
    18

    Adam brown

    06/15/09 | Report as spam

    Adam

    The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone. The above thought is smart and doesn?t require any further addition. It?s perfect thought from my side.
    Adam

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

Click Here
advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement